<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									QuantPhi Forum - Recent Topics				            </title>
            <link>https://quant-phi.com/community/</link>
            <description>QuantPhi Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-GB</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 11:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>The Black-Scholes model: A significant breakthrough or a failed model?</title>
                        <link>https://quant-phi.com/community/main-forum/the-black-scholes-model-a-significant-breakthrough-or-a-failed-model/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 13:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[The development of the Black-Scholes model for option valuation (Black-Scholes (1973), Merton (1973)) earned Merton and Scholes the 1997 Nobel Prize in Economics &quot;for a new method for determ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The development of the Black-Scholes model for option valuation (Black-Scholes (1973), Merton (1973)) earned Merton and Scholes the 1997 Nobel Prize in Economics "for a new method for determining the value of derivatives" (Nobel Prize press release), and at the time, it was considered "a significant 'break-through in attacking the option problem" (Merton (1973)). However, shortly after its publication, it was discovered that its assumptions were unrealistic (Latané and Rendleman (1976)). Among them was the assumption of constant volatility, since the volatility implied by the model turns out to be dependent on expiration dates and strike prices. These serious drawbacks have led to a current critical movement regarding the Black-Scholes model, advocating for its abandonment and even its elimination as a subject of study in Quantitative Finance. However, the Black-Scholes model remains fundamental to many subsequent developments, especially those related to implied volatility, since it is defined from the Black-Scholes formula ("the wrong number which, plugged into the wrong formula, gives the right answer," according to Rebonato (1999)).<br /><br />Therefore, the question we pose is this: Should the Black-Scholes model be considered, as Merton believed, a significant breakthrough, or is it, on the contrary, a failed model that should be abandoned and forgotten?</p>
<p>References:</p>
<ul>
<li>Black, F. and M. Scholes (1973): "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities", Journal of Political Economy, 81 (3): 637–654.</li>
<li>Latané, H. A. and R.J. Rendleman (1976). "Standard Deviations of Stock Price Ratios Implied in Option Prices". <i>Journal of Finance</i>, <i>31</i>(2), 369–381.</li>
<li>Merton, R.C. (1973): "Theory of Rational Option Pricing", Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4 (1), 141-183.</li>
<li>Rebonato (1999): "Volatility and Correlation in the Pricing of Equity, FX and Interest Rate Options", Wiley.</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://quant-phi.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://quant-phi.com/community/main-forum/the-black-scholes-model-a-significant-breakthrough-or-a-failed-model/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Writing mathematical formulas in the Forum</title>
                        <link>https://quant-phi.com/community/main-forum/writing-mathematical-formulas/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 08:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[You can write mathematical formulas in posts and replies with LaTex, with the delimiters \(...\) for in-line math, and \ or $$...$$ for displayed equations.
Formulas are rendered auto...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can write mathematical formulas in posts and replies with LaTex, with the delimiters<span> </span><code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">\(...\)</span></code><span> for in-line math, and </span><code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">\</span></code><span> or $$...$$ for displayed equations.</span></p>
<p>Formulas are rendered automatically after posting.</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://quant-phi.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://quant-phi.com/community/main-forum/writing-mathematical-formulas/</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		